Wednesday, January 5, 2011

The System

So, the new congress takes office today, and that fact spurred me to write another article, this one merely showing my thoughts on the current state of affairs, in general, of U.S. politics. To get atraight to the point, our two-party system needs serious reform, by which I mean, that we need a diferrent system. What's happened in this country since the dawn of the current two-party system is a sort of false schism, a sheer mockery of true ideological differences. Though I prefer not to go into, cliches about the political engineering of this country, the fact still (supposedly) stands that we live in a place where different views are encouraged and accepted, and the current state of affairsin Washington and across the country allows for none of this.

I feel as if I'm rambling quite a bit here, so forgive me.

More coherently: We have here "Republicans" and "Democrats." Starting on the "right," the GOP, started as an anti slavery party, with foundations in classical liberalism and fiscal conservativism, has turned into a mockery of itself, a bloated group of corporate payoffs who get nothing done that doesn't suit the true heads of this country. Democrats are the same way. Started as a party of the common, blue collor man, the politically correct elite, like the maggots on the carcass of a dead animal, have infested the Democratic party and made it a mere shadow of its former self. The result is a group of career politicians who don't represent the will of the people, or even conflicting views at all beyond the key buzzwords of the current day. All the senators and representatives chat and have coffee at "The Monocle" on D Street, play golf together and accept their corporate sponsorships, and then when congress is in session they sit and argue about nothingness. They stop beneficial progress and encourage detrimental policies. They all fight for their own agendas, or those of their handlers, and any true "man of the people becomes so caught up in parliementary procedures so antiquated that even the British Parliament no longer utilizes them that no real discussion ever happens. The mojority of the time the will of the people isn't even expressed. It's a sham, and they've duped everyone into believing it.

Which leads me to an easy solution: fire congress. It's the only way. Fire congress, and start over. Draw, from the common man, a politician that represents the will of the people, and that will stand and protect those interests when challenged. The way to achieve this, you ask? Easier said than done I suppose. However it starts by embracing the third party, and giving them equal ability hold office. Stop stigmatizing them as "third party." Call them by their names! Those parties that the people don't particularly enjoy will be weeded out, yet it's as if in the current state of affairs they never had a chance in the first place. They're muzzled, and when they finally are allowed to speak out, the big players make them, like so much else, a mockery of true thought. The rent is too damn high, but that never means I would vote for Jimmy McMillan, and when people like him comedically steal the show from anyone with real thought, they do make things hilarious (which is always necessary), but also allow the big players to move their pawns into place. In New York, Cuomo, the main man, who had family in politics, and who has possible mafia ties, was elected. I wonder why. Paladino, who had a 6 point lead, self destructed, and the insertion of ridiculous candidates like McMillan stopped not only him from reclaiming ground, but also the legitimate Green, Libertarian, and other candidates to be even remembered, let alone considered for election. We need to start over, elect actual pooliticians (not pawns), and return to the foundations of the system, for though some like to believe that progress is necessary for greatness, even if true, progression from a shoddy foundation leads to structural insecurity, and untilmately, destruction.

It will be difficult though. To quote comedian George Carlin: "The owners of this country don't want that. I'm talking about the real owners now. The big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. The politicians are there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have *owners*. The *own* you. They own everything. They own all the important land and all of the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for Senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets and own all the big media corporations. They've got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars a year lobbying. Lobbying for what they want. And we all know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don't want. They dont want a population capable of critical thinking...It's a big club and you and I ain't in it...The table is tilted. The game is rigged and nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people: blue collar, white collar, it doesn't matter what color shirt you have on, continue to elect these rich ****suckers who don't give a **** about them. They don't care about you at All! At all! And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on. The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it."' A bit more optimistic than Mr. Carlin, though of an agreeable nature, I believe we still have a chance to disband the big club, and beat the owners at their own game. I don't now how just yet (help me out if you want), but it starts with us, the people, fixing the system which has become so corrupted, on both sides of an aisle which shouldn't exist, which should be an arena, where people can enter equally from all sides. That's the way to fight back. HTinking critically, stopping this garbage.

I end on a positive note. A new congress, comes into office today. A new congress, which has the same pawns of the big players, the same people who like us Americans to be a willfully ignorant working body, the gears of a well oiled machine, pacified by fake arguments and trivial nothingness. Hopefully though, we can find a few gems, athe few politicians who have not yet been corrupted, and who could hopefully be the front lines of a fight for freedom

Until next time, I bid you fare well, and may the force be with you, always.

~ Jeff

5 comments:

  1. Forgive my typos. It seems that quick typing late at night doesn't suit me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is one of the things i have told many of my friends and said a few times on the site, instead of focusing more on helping our country and its citizens, congress bashes the other party with propaganda in attempts to fulfill personal agendas not necessarily supported by the citizens, Im not sure how effective wiping the slate clean would be, as it would leave a gap in our "leadership" and temporarily dishearten the citizens. If something like you suggested DID happen, then it would need to be quick and quiet.
    One thing to leave this off with, watch this video, it totally hits the nail on the head. Notice how both senator McCain and Obama criticize each other more than talk about what they are going to do.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfd5g8Y_Jqo

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well Jeffrey, while I agree with most of what you have to say, this "starting congress over" thing is one of those "In theory it just may work" ideas, but in the real world it would never happen. I agree with you, I think the political infighting has become atrocious. Its downright awful, nothing gets accomplished, no laws get past anymore without being filibustered at least once or twice, and the whole "lame-duck" congress sessions that were going on last month, give me a break. Now I'm not saying I'm above this because I'm definitely not, I feel the country should be run a certain way and if I were a congressman I would try my very best to see that that happens. However I would like to think that I would bend some if it were good for the American people.
    But about "getting rid of Congress and starting over", it would never work. Where could that even begin? The President would never be able to say that. If he were ever to even hint at that he would be shot, impeached or, at the very least, ridiculed and would never be taken seriously again. No Congress member would ever say that either. What if the people made a petition? We are a democracy after all. that still would not work. Even if you get all of the American signatures you can, a law cannot be passed to get rid of a branch of government, even if it is only temporary. Plus, the career politicians in Washington have so much weight they can throw around. They pull strings like nobody's business. So, like I said, even if you were able to get every American signature possible, they would still find a way nip it in the bud. And, just curious, would the bill to disassemble and rebuild Congress, have to go through Congress? Or would the National Guard or something just block off Capitol Hill? I can't even imagine how that would work. Can the President Veto Congress? It would cause total anarchy. If the people couldn't get what they want, they would start riots. It would be chaos. It is the Supreme Court's job to protect the Constitution. Is it un-Constitutional to temporarily be-rid of the Legislative Branch? Plus, what would all of the men and women in Congress do if this were to happen? Puting 535 people on their asses can't be good for our unemployment rate. Plus, how long would it be before new representatives would be elected? Especially if we don't know who we are looking for since career politicians are out of the question.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you both might be slightly misunderstanding what I'm trying to say here. When I say "fire congress," I don't mean "abolish the legislative branch." I merely mean literally firing congressmen who don't do a good job. The fact that we have no term limits for senators or representatives in this country makes it fairly easy for corruption to set in. The Pay-offs and bribes soon start, and we have a bunch of people sitting in a room espousing the beliefs of their sponsor rather than their district. So, first, impose term limits. Then, phase out these old bags of bones who have been siting in the same seat for upwards of 20 years. Make it easy for people who aren't career politicians to run and make their voices heard. See what the people want, and then strictly hold the congressmen accountable to that. Some would say "that is what voting is for," and, to an extent, they're right. However, without term limits acting as an ultimate safeguard, it seems that in the status quo those who win are those who were chosen to win, not by the voting body, but by the business interests that Mr. Carlin speaks so vehemently of. Just look at New York this past election and you'll see what I'm talking about. And of course, there are always exceptions to the rule, such as senator Paul in Arkansas and senator Rubio here in Florida, two new politicians, relatively untouched by the guys in Washington. And you're both right, it would and will be very difficult to stop this rampant corruption, and that's becasue, as I said before, the big guys up North don't want term limits because they don't want *accountability*, because then the masses will finally figure out that no matter who is pretending to be their champion, the same people have een running the show this entire time. It's a domino effect that the career politicians and their handlers don't want, because then they wouldn't be able to act above the law, evade punishment, and ultimately capitalize on the suffering of 300 million Americans. I don't know how we can stop this, but I do think that 2010 was a year of awakening, so to speak. We have more and more people tuning in to what's really going on, and now, hopefully, we have a few politicians, Republican and Democra, who care enough about ethics and morals to actually work for the people who put them in their chair. I have faith in the American people though. It does us no good to be fatalistic. Something is changing. Whether or not it's what we need will just have to be seen soon enough.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I see Jeffrey's point in this article,I think congress is getting better now, and since the Tucson shooting some people are tuning down their rhetoric. I don't think Loughner's actions were triggered by the amount of rhetoric in todays' media, but I think it is good that some politicians are realizing they need to stop throwing stones out of their glass houses.

    ReplyDelete